Malfeasance - Christine O'Grady Gregoire and Mark Allen Emmert
|
Machiavellian principles have applied at University of Washington also within
This series of articles especially relates to malfeasance by Christine O Gregoire, Governor, State of Washington (WA) and Mark A Emmert, President, University of Washington (UW). It exposes officials in the executive and judicial branches of government, especially judges who have committed gross judicial misconduct by ex parte contact and opined on issues not in evidence for political expedience. It discusses public officials who hold no post-graduate academic degrees or other qualifications that a reasonable person would expect for employment in high government office. Particularly, it names officials who have included falsified academic credentials in election campaign material, submitted falsified applications for taxpayer-funded employment, and obtained academic promotion through Easy Rider degrees and political machination - now a criminal offense in State of Washington. A person who falsely claims to possess a credential issued by an institution of higher education to gain a position in government commits a gross misdemeanor. In State of Washington, a gross misdemeanor carries with it maximum punishment of one year imprisonment and/or $5,000 fine. That does not take into account punishment for malfeasance. The term "malfeasance" means misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official. It refers, with associated expressions "misfeasance" and "nonfeasance", to neglect in discharging public obligations under common law or statutes. "Impunity" means exemption from penalty and freedom from punishment for malfeasance and other crimes. [Impunity] Academic harassment defines as behavior by university administrators, the executive branch of government, and the judiciary which: unreasonably interferes with faculty member, public intellectual, or student academic performance and freedom of expression both on or off campus; distributes verbal, written or electronic communication with the intent to annoy; interferes with the operation of computer systems; causes unlawful arrest; creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment; directs ad hominem remarks with intent to demean, belittle, or cause personal humiliation or embarrassment; threatens, intimidates, or coerces for unlawful purposes. Abstracts and Roll of Dishonor menus link to articles about named individuals. Whores of Academe and Elder Abuse menus (also textual links) connect to articles by topic. [Roll of Dishonor Case Studies] |
||||||||||||||
|
|
 |
Mark A Emmert condoned dereliction by Todd B Mildon (UW Registrar) when he covered up Gregoire’s gross misdemeanor by neglect to validate her credentials. Similarly, Karen W Morse (President, Western Washington University - WWU) condoned dereliction by Joseph St Hilaire (WWU Registrar) when he covered up Becker’s gross misdemeanor by neglect to validate her credentials. The pattern or practice of deceit effectively makes both Emmert and Morse accessories after the fact. Documents obtained from other sources show that both Gregoire and Becker committed gross misdemeanors by falsely claiming that they possessed particular academic credentials when they did not.
Ironically, registrars at University of Washington (UW) and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) have withheld or destroyed first-party documents and transcripts as part of a coordinated campaign of academic harassment by university administrators. They have deprived the author of his livelihood as a professor for more than two decades despite his having completed two PhD degrees and sixty years as a professor, communication professional, public intellectual, and journalist.
[Judge not, that ye be not Judged] [Recalcitrant Registrars - Mark A Emmert and Karen W Morse]
A prepublication notice gave featured individuals a chance to respond to charges affecting their ethics or moral character. The author gave them notice under international codes of ethics agreed among journalists. Several of those codes, tested in international courts, have legal precedent. People named or affected incidentally received a copy as a courtesy. For public accountability, the author encouraged them to respond in open exchange within ten days. He did not solicit personal opinions; therefore, any response could only address matters of fact with particularity. None of the recipients acknowledged receipt of the letter or endeavored to mitigate the issues.
[Prepublication Letter - 11 Mar 08/14:57]
Instead, Gregoire and Emmert evidently tried to kill the messenger by using illegal denial of service techniques. They allowed University of Washington computer technicians to catastrophically crash Contra Cabal computer systems three times during the seven days following distribution of the letter and flooded the web sites to try to prevent publication of content protected under First Amendment to the US Constitution.
Since Emmert became UW president almost four years ago, he has received a stream of reports of violations of federal law. Instead of heeding requests and warnings he repeatedly allowed UW computer technicians to sabotage computer systems and web sites. He has simulated the pattern or practice initiated by his predecessor Richard L McCormick in collusion with Ronald A Johnson and Carol S Niccolls his special counsel. Gregoire (as attorney general, governor and Niccolls’s mentor) has for twelve years condoned multiple malfeasance by neglect to uphold the law.
[Current Internet Censorship and Computer Cracking] [Denial of Service Attacks (DoS Bots)]
Taxpayers have a right to know about Emmert's million-dollar salary; faculty members who receive comparatively meager remuneration; students and parents who pay exorbitant tuition or fees; and myriad malfeasance by corrupt administrators who receive obscene salary increases allegedly to cover up crimes. They should also know about a governor, state officials, and judges who willfully condone malfeasance and provide impunity for wrongdoers.
For example, Johnson, a university computer and communications vice president, has for more than twelve years instructed or allowed his technicians to: crack into computer systems; flood web sites; destroy academic databases; censor incoming and outgoing email; sabotage operating systems; download malware; deny access to paid accounts; coerce commercial internet providers to restrict service; and used taxpayer funds to cause damage to private computer systems and databases in excess of $50,000.00. Successive UW presidents granted him impunity.
[Computer Crackers - University of Washington] [Statement of Facts]
|
In a separate article, the author defines prior restraint and identifies current events sanctioned by Big Mamas and implemented by their mischievous, intellectually challenged leprechauns. Prior restraint and censorship have recently occurred at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), University of Washington (UW), Seattle Jewish Mafia (SJM) and other universities and government funded institutions. The term "Big Mama" describes totalitarian university presidents and government officials who censor speech protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The term previously applied to Internet censors in the People's Republic of China. The analogy seems apt in light of the politically correct behavior now common in large and prestigious US universities as a parody on Big Brother, the omnipresent leader of a totalitarian state in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four. Some content excerpted from Technocratic Despotism: Incognito and Safe from the Vexation of Thinking by Paul Trummel. Licensed to The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), Assembly for Computers in English (ACE) Newsletter, 10(1): (Summer 1996) 10-15. NCTE has since removed the original article from their web site; consequently, the author has linked a PDF of the full text. [Nothing Succeeds Like Excess] [ACE Newsletter] |
||
 |
Niccolls colluded with Johnson to destroy academic research databases and web sites, denied access to paid computer accounts, and has participated in multiple other frauds. A former assistant attorney general (AG) under Governor Christine O Gregoire (while Attorney General), Niccolls will eventually have to answer a Washington State Bar Association (WSBA), Rules for Professional Conduct complaint in company with other AG and UW lawyers. They intercepted or diverted US mail and email addressed to UW regents and other top echelon administrators allegedly to keep them in ignorance of crimes committed by lower echelon employees.
[RPC Rule 8.4 Misconduct]
Emmert inherited both Johnson and Niccolls from McCormick and promoted Niccolls to Special Counsel to the President. Despite their malfeasance, Emmert has increased Johnson's salary from $252,000.00/pa to $321,684.00/pa, an increase of $69,684.00 (27.65%/4), and increased Niccolls's salary from $138,000.00/pa to $190,560.00, an increase of $52,560.00 (38.08%/4).
Faculty members who receive comparatively meager remuneration, also students and parents who pay exorbitant tuition or fees, should remember these excesses when they consider reelection of a governor who has condoned criminal behavior by successive UW presidents.
[Nothing Succeeds Like Excess]
The prepublication letter essentially contained the following information:
Washington courts have for seven years restricted the author’s movement and contact in Seattle and University of Washington continues to harass the author despite US, UN, and EU mandates and legal precedents to the contrary. The malfeasance forms part of a pattern or practice of similar behavior against students and elderly people which has resulted in unlawful expulsions and evictions also three alleged homicides by abuse and attempts on the author’s life.
[US Constitution] [Human Rights] [The Ultimate Machiavelli] [Elder Abuse - Abstracts]
Not responding to the listed issues will result in public exposé that will certainly affect reelection aspirations. As an EU journalist/citizen, the author has an apolitical interest in Washington election successes or failures; however, his experiences in Seattle created a dangerous precedent for other journalists who may write about politically sensitive issues. The author opines about individual behavior and ignores political affiliations unless relevant when explaining a particular point.
[Coercion and Constitutional Law] [General Denial]
The author intends to expose malfeasance that contravened United States Constitution and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. That malfeasance had a direct impact upon his languishment in King County Jail for almost four months without due process of law or legal counsel. Approaching seventy years of age, the author experienced arbitrary incarceration, solitary confinement incommunicado and torture that caused several near-death experiences and compared with treatment afforded terrorists and political detainees.
[Metamorphosis]
Unlawful restriction on movement, death threats, suborned defamation by a “Seattle Jewish Mafia” operating out of Herzl-Ner Tamid Conservative Congregation (a synagogue on Mercer Island near Seattle) and repeated malfeasance by officials at University of Washington, by Seattle City Attorney, and by Washington State Attorneys General continues to violate government mandates.
[Seattle Jewish Mafia] [Kill the Messenger] [Monkey Business] [Bias and Political Expedience]
Washington Supreme Court unanimously reversed decisions by Washington Superior Court (Doerty) and Washington Court of Appeals (Becker) that denied First Amendment rights. Seattle Municipal Court also dismissed frivolous criminal charges filed by Seattle City Attorney Thomas A Carr in a consort with Council House (CH) lawyers. Both findings vindicated the author of professional wrongdoing.
[Supreme Court Decision #1] [Supreme Court Decision #2]
However, Barbara A Madsen, the supreme court scribe, inserted a series of politically motivated, unsubstantiated, personally slanderous and/or defamatory statements into the published opinion which the court should not have allowed. They related to issues not before the court based upon unproven claims and suborned perjury.
[Judicial Slander - Mary Kay Becker, James A Doerty, and Barbara A Madsen]
Judge James A Doerty (one of Judge Anthony P Wartnik’s straw judges) jailed the author with an indeterminate contempt order for almost four months (25 days in solitary confinement among murderers and rapists) using politically expedient findings for publishing six expository leaflets. Doerty disallowed a discovery process and benefit of counsel. CH directors (including Wartnik’s wife) retroactively committed perjury and suborned witnesses to cover up judicial misconduct.
[Cruel and Unusual Punishment] [Seattle Jewish Mafia - Conspiracy - 2001-02] [Straw-Man Stratagem]
CH directors received prepublication notices prior to publication of each leaflet with a copy to their attorney. The notices informed them of the author’s right under Seattle Municipal Code and US First Amendment to publish and distribute newsletters within the building. A CH attorney concurred. The notice gave directors an opportunity to respond and comment before publication. Only one director replied with an insulting, subliterate email message.
On receiving the prepublication letter, another director publicly voiced his intent to incarcerate the author or confine him in a mental institution for publication of six two-page flyers and distribution of about 150 copies of each. The leaflets contained reports of elder abuse and fraudulent misappropriation of federal funds by Wartnik’s wife and other directors.
[Six Two-Page Flyers] [Tall Structure Terror]
The posting of the six flyers on doors took place during a 24-month period. Although tenants should have received in aggregate 1,350 copies, the property manager unlawfully removed about 450 from doors and destroyed them. The actual number of leaflets distributed during two years totaled about 900. The content did not appear on a European web site until later and resulted in the unlawful incarceration.
[Prohibited Acts by Owners]
Only six people asked not to receive newsletters. The author invoked his opt-out policy to honor those requests; however, the same people later filed perjury complaining about the content of newsletters that they did not receive. Several tenants congratulated the author for keeping them informed about elder abuse and their constitutional rights. At worst, some opinions bothered some people; however, hurt feelings form no basis for an injunction limiting important liberty interests in perpetuity.
[Perjury and Subornation] [Miscreant Chart]
Officials of journalism unions governed by UK and EU law will consider the precedential impact upon journalists that a syndicate (including but not limited to Governor Christine O Gregoire, Judges Mary Kathryn (Kay) Becker, James A Doerty, Michael C Hayden, Barbara A Madsen, Anthony P Wartnik, and UW President Mark A Emmert) continues to have on the human and civil rights of EU journalists working in US and whether members of Washington executive and judicial branches hold executive or judicial immunity when they commit malfeasance and judicial misconduct. [Without Let or Hindrance]
[Amicus Curiae] [Washington Black Robed Syndicate] [Judge not, that ye be not Judged] [Impunity]
 |
Arguably, as a former attorney general and now governor, Gregoire holds ultimate responsibility for repeated malfeasance by neglecting to address issues and maintaining laissez faire and political expedience for more than a decade. In particular, Becker, Doerty, Emmert, Gregoire, Hayden, Madsen and Wartnik (ex parte input) wrote biased opinions to cover up malfeasance by: Washington Assistant Attorneys General; Washington Superior Court; Washington Court of Appeals; successive Presidents and Administrators, University of Washington; also myriad elder abuse committed by Board of Directors, Council House, Inc., Seattle which included three cases of alleged homicide by abuse. [The Trials]
Former Governor Gary Locke wrote in his response when apprised of the issues (17 Apr 98): “The Superior Court could call a grand jury if so requested by a public attorney on a showing of good cause. Also, the Organized Crime Advisory Board, may petition the Supreme Court for an order appointing a special inquiry judge. If a special inquiry judge is appointed, the organized crime advisory board shall, with the consent of the Governor, name a special prosecutor.” Gregoire has not only ignored Locke’s admonition for ten years but has neglected to respond to a series of registered letters that requested her to address myriad instances of alleged criminal activity.
Non-exclusive excerpts give some idea of content:
01. Jailing an elderly journalist approaching seventy years of age for political expedience.
02. Refusing the accused the right to confront and cross-examine accusers and their witnesses.
03. Presenting no specific prosecutorial charges.
04. Falsifying, concealing, and destroying public and university records.
05. Bribing witnesses and co-conspirators.
06. Rewriting grievances as indictments to reclassify complainants as defendants.
07. Admitting unsworn, hearsay and suborned testimony as evidence.
08. Misuse of assistant attorneys general to censor content protected by the First Amendment.
09. Denying the right to use legal counsel.
10. Holding hearings in absentia.
11. Sanctioning criminal activity by assistant attorneys general.
12. Silently withholding public records to cover up crimes.
13. Censoring official documents.
14. Ongoing destruction of computer systems and databases also web site flooding.
Although Emmert has received repeated warnings about this violation of federal law, UW computer technicians continue to sabotage Contra Cabal computer systems and web sites on a regular schedule.
[Computer Crackers - University of Washington] [Current Internet Censorship and Computer Cracking]
15. Neglecting to respond to registered mail or to act upon content that claimed malfeasance.
16. Destroying first-party records.
17. Neglecting to address elder abuse and three alleged homicides by abuse.
18. Changing mandated procedures for political expedience.
19. Falsifying court opinions to support biased judgments.
The pseudonym Nmesis used in Contra Cabal, and in other printed and electronic communications, applies to the author's persona. He openly declares personal or conflicting interests that relate to topics or to opinion especially when the content draws upon advocacy, experience, conclusion, or interpretation.
Journalists have a responsibility to gather information and to develop public awareness about wrongdoing by people who break their respective codes of conduct. The author believes that he has a responsibility to bring abuse and wrongdoing to the notice of professional associations and to inform law enforcement about malfeasance and misuse of public funds.
Ethical rules dictate that journalists must report the truth no matter whom they offend and with disregard for the consequences of publication. Accurate reporting predicates a higher purpose and the common good.
Targeted individuals initially attacked the author and maliciously damaged him and/or his reputation by libel, slander, or allegedly committed other unlawful or negligent acts. Prior to publication, all targeted subjects have an opportunity to mitigate damage and to refute statements that could negatively affect their reputations or cause investigation or prosecution of them for alleged illegal acts. [Sherking Responsibility]
No person receives immunity from investigation and the author does not report issues arbitrarily. Individuals whom the author may personally respect receive no favors. In fact, anything published results from investigation, verification, and validation taking into account violations of law or breach of established rules and ethical practices. Part of the validation process involves checking a pattern or practice of aberrant behavior by targeted public officials that sources experienced and documented.
Contra Cabal provides a forum in which powerless people may express themselves powerfully without fear of reprisal. They need a means to expose the injustices meted to them by a privileged elite that increasingly usurps authority. Contra Cabal also gives them the opportunity to warn others of the frauds perpetrated upon students by corrupt or negligent university administrators and elderly people by recipients of government funding with impunity obtained from increasingly anarchic and uncaring members of the three branches of Washington government and university presidents.
The author abhors “trial by press” on ethical grounds; however, if Gregoire and her syndicate continue either to refuse or to ignore requests for due process and independent investigation of criminal complaints, then that leaves no alternative but for international media involvement. He hopes that by the time he publishes he has something positive to add about Washington state officials that will balance the exposé but will not hold his breath while waiting. Gregoire, epitomized by her sycophants as the Washington state tigress, has yet to hear a British lion’s roar, especially at election time.
Whores of the Realm US Supreme Court has determined that executive immunity bears the burden of justification based upon the nature of the act performed, not the identity of the actor who performed it. Political expedience coupled with bias defines as malfeasance and provides probable cause for lawsuits against governors who do not enforce constitutional guarantees. If Gregoire does not comply with law, then her malfeasance makes her liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Washington state legislature must decide whether Gregoire can answer four questions affirmatively given the extensive, documented malfeasance extant in Washington State executive branch and at University of Washington. In deciding probable cause for impeachment, a reasonable person must ask four questions that relate to any challenged act, omission, or decision: 1. Did the challenge involve a basic governmental policy, program, or objective? If clear and unequivocal answers in the affirmative result, then the challenged act, omission, or decision can, with reasonable confidence, classify as a discretionary governmental process regardless of its lack of wisdom. If one or more of the questions call for, or suggest a negative answer, then an official inquiry must take place into the facts and circumstances. Reasonable grounds, coupled with good-faith, afford a discretionary basis for exemption from lawsuits for official acts performed by governors who hold qualified immunity dependent upon the scope of discretion and responsibilities of their office. However, executive disciplinary action predicates upon whether a governor under any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, exposed a citizen of the United States (or other person within that jurisdiction) to deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by constitutional law. University of Washington administrators continue their autocratic form of government. That institution has the open support of the governor and attorney general in its criminal and exclusionary activities. Gregoire continues to deny due process of law using delay then denial of justice tactics as she has done for several decades.
Computer vandalism and Internet denial-of-service attacks continue. The Cabal has effectively granted criminals impunity and FBI, despite repeated requests, has apparently done nothing to stop the commission of international crime. As governor of a state that claims democracy, Gregoire must: allow voters to decide issues based upon information obtained from the Internet; give them access to information relative to both sides of any particular issue; carry out her duty and responsibility to protect freedom of expression; stop condoning or granting impunity to government-funded censors and technologists; and stop interference with, and destruction of, the careers of controversial journalists and academicians by government officials. Gregoire must immediately issue orders publicly to University of Washington to cease and desist use of taxpayer resources to fund unlawful denial-of-service attacks that harass and censor journalists to support political expedience. Otherwise, she has an international cyberwar to address. She has covered up serious crime at University of Washington for at least twelve years. Now she must come clean and take action to insure that due process of law takes place.
Phyllis M Wise, Provost and Executive Vice President, University of Washington (UW) received twenty-six messages (2008) which asked her to order her staff to stop Internet denial-of-service attacks and other alleged criminal activity. Instead, of responding to the issues, she covered them up using willful blindness. Meanwhile, the vandalism continues. In law, the term "willful blindness" describes contrived ignorance. Officials seek to evade civil or criminal liability by feigning ignorance of facts that involve personal liability. [Incompetence and Willful Blindness] Former Governor Gary Locke made the following recommendation upon hearing about the UW malfeasance; however, Gregoire (both as attorney general and governor) with Richard L McCormick and Mark A Emmert (successive UW Presidents) has ignored Governor Locke's suggestions for mediation and mitigation: The Superior Court could call a grand jury if so requested by a public attorney on a showing of good cause. Also, the Organized Crime Advisory Board may petition the Supreme Court for an order appointing a special inquiry judge. If a special inquiry judge is appointed, the organized crime advisory board shall, with the consent of the Governor, name a special prosecutor.
|
|
Paul Trummel PhD (RPI ABD), PhD (UW ABD), MS (RPI), MSc (UK), BSc (UK) Associate Professor, Communication and Rhetoric (Retired) International Federation of Journalists, Brussels (International Press Card)
|
||
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2008 by Paul Trummel |
|||||||||||||||||||
