Sociopathic Trio

James A Doerty, Ronald A Johnson, and Stephen A Mitchell

Case studies address repugnant moral and ethical behavior encountered in
US universities also Washington Judiciary and Executive Branch
during many years as a corporate CEO and professor.


Machiavellian principles have applied at University of Washington also within
Washington Executive and Judicial branches for more than two decades.

Mark A Emmert, President, University of Washington.
Christine O Gregoire, Governor, State of Washington.

This series of articles especially relates to malfeasance by Christine O Gregoire, Governor, State of Washington (WA) and Mark A Emmert, President, University of Washington (UW). It exposes officials in the executive and judicial branches of government, especially judges who have committed gross judicial misconduct by ex parte contact and opined on issues not in evidence for political expedience. It discusses public officials who hold no post-graduate academic degrees or other qualifications that a reasonable person would expect for employment in high government office. Particularly, it names officials who have included falsified academic credentials in election campaign material, submitted falsified applications for taxpayer-funded employment, and obtained academic promotion through Easy Rider degrees and political machination - now a criminal offense in State of Washington. A person who falsely claims to possess a credential issued by an institution of higher education to gain a position in government commits a gross misdemeanor. In State of Washington, a gross misdemeanor carries with it maximum punishment of one year imprisonment and/or $5,000 fine. That does not take into account punishment for malfeasance.
[RCW 9A.60.070] [RCW 9A.20.021]

The term "malfeasance" means misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official. It refers, with associated expressions "misfeasance" and "nonfeasance", to neglect in discharging public obligations under common law or statutes. "Impunity" means exemption from penalty and freedom from punishment for malfeasance and other crimes. [Impunity]

Academic harassment defines as behavior by university administrators, the executive branch of government, and the judiciary which: unreasonably interferes with faculty member, public intellectual, or student academic performance and freedom of expression both on or off campus; distributes verbal, written or electronic communication with the intent to annoy; interferes with the operation of computer systems; causes unlawful arrest; creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment; directs ad hominem remarks with intent to demean, belittle, or cause personal humiliation or embarrassment; threatens, intimidates, or coerces for unlawful purposes.

Abstracts and Roll of Dishonor menus link to articles about named individuals. Whores of Academe and Elder Abuse menus (also textual links) connect to articles by topic. [Roll of Dishonor Case Studies]


Prior Restraint and Internet Crimes
University and State of Washington

Governor Christine Gregoire and UW President Mark Emmert permitted a series of Internet crimes in violation of a Washington Supreme Court decision that protects Contra Cabal from prior restraint.

Instead of responding to words with more words, they permitted UW technicians to harass the publisher. They destroyed media with intent to prevent exposure of myriad criminal activity by government and university employees.

University of Washington, Information Technology used a proxy server in Washington DC for massive web site flooding in another attempt to crash Contra Cabal sites (17 Jun 08).

State employees used multiple denial-of-service attacks which caused $500,000 actual plus inestimable collateral damage to computers, databases, applications, and networks in both US and EU.

They then prevented this article and others from appearing on the Internet for 21 months. Additional diagnostics and system repairs cost more than $10,000.00 plus cost of collateral damage to associated web sites, subscriber databases, and mailing applications.

[University Internet Crimes - Full Text]

The late William D Winn, a distinguished University of Washington (UW) professor, described Ronald A Johnson, Vice President, Information Technology, University of Washington as “the most evil man I have ever met” after studying Johnson’s pathological lying, abhorrent behavior, and machination. Faculty members and students have since avoided Johnson like they would avoid a plague. They fear the damage that he can do to their careers and several of them classified him as a sociopath. [Psychopath]

Johnson’s lack of credentials give some reason for his psychotic desire to destroy the careers of people who have more experience and qualifications than he can possibly achieve himself. Semi-literate, he has manipulated himself into a top university job through guile and false academic credentials. Likewise, Judge James A Doerty, Washington Superior Court and Stephen A Mitchell, Administrator, Council House, Seattle have condoned or committed elder abuse and homicide by abuse respectively. Like Johnson they also classify as subliterate. [Ravening Sociopath] [Rampant Judicial Delusion]

Mark A Emmert, UW President inherited Johnson from his predecessor Richard L McCormick then increased his salary to $321,684.00, an increase of $69,684.00 (27.65%/4). Johnson originally received double the salary paid to a full professor with tenure as a clinical (adjunct) professor although he possessed none of the medical qualifications for the position as generally defined at that time. He then gradually leveraged salary increases by adding false academic credentials to his curriculum vitae.

He now receives about four times the original salary although he holds virtually no academic qualifications to justify his appointment as an associate professor with tenure or in any other capacity. Investigation into his academic experience revealed academic fraud and a close examination of UW payroll records showed evidence of quid pro quo with fast-track promotions using easy-rider criteria. [False Academic Credentials] [Easy Riders]

Sociopaths, inherently confrontational, feel no fear of repercussion or ostracism. They will commit crimes without any moral or ethical consideration to assuage their financial greed and self-aggrandizement. They lie pathologically and perform a mafia role for the institutions that employ them. They often create a useful, unethical, impenetrable barrier. In Washington, this has allowed successive amoral University of Washington presidents and Council House directors to isolate or distance themselves from the crimes committed in their names.

Machiavellian princes (university presidents) and their minions (deans) often employ sociopaths when compulsive lying and breaking laws suit their purpose. Sociopaths perform dirty work without question and provide a social barrier between administrators, faculty members, students, and the electorate.

Using a sociopath as a confrontational go-between follows a (political science/risk management) maxim evident in the behavior of Johnson and Steven G Olswang. Johnson the out-of-control technologist and Olswang the ultimate Machiavelli with his equally remunerated alter ego (or maybe doppelganger) Carol S Niccolls fit that role and allow Emmert to insulate himself from reality. [The Ultimate Machiavelli] [Nothing Succeeds Like Excess]


Washington Supreme Court Decision (30 Mar 06)

In a unanimous decision by nine judges, Washington Supreme Court concluded that Doerty abused his discretion in restraining the author from contacting nonparties and in adding content restrictions to a frivolous antiharassment order brought by Mitchell. It also concluded that the Doerty erred in multiple findings of contempt of court. It reversed the draconian trial and appellate decisions which resulted in the author spending time in jail.

All the contempt motions based upon alleged violations of the original flawed and unconstitutional anti-harassment order. The trial court denied the author his right to counsel and jailed him for 111 days (including 25 days in solitary confinement where he suffered torture at the hands of King County Jail guards). [Metamorphosis]

Supreme Court found that Doerty had absolutely no justification for refusing a continuance and neglecting to provide legal counsel. It reversed all trial and appellate court decisions. By failing to address judicial misconduct by Doerty, Judge Mary Kay Becker, Washington Court of Appeals condoned prior restraint, constructive eviction from a residence, and jail time, without considering constitutional rights.

Council House and King County have not made reparation for unlawful incarceration without charge or trial for almost four months in the same way that University of Washington have not addressed myriad administrative abuse and breach of contract over two decades. Instead, both entities continue their harassment using web site and computer sabotage which construes as criminal malicious mischief. [Supreme Court Decision #2 - 30 Mar 06] [Rampant Judicial Delusion]

The term “sociopath” (formerly psychopath) describes the DSM-IV clinical term “antisocial personality disorder” which defines aggressive, impulsive, antisocial behavior. Approximately 3% of men and 1% of women suffer from this disorder. Doerty, Johnson, and Mitchell classify as sociopaths based upon their perennial performance in Washington Superior Court, University of Washington, and Council House respectively using academic credentials and experiential claims most of which they invented and published in false and misleading curricula vitae.

Sociopaths often encounter legal difficulties due to their disregard for societal standards and the rights of others which often includes criminal activity. They do not appear to experience a full range of human emotions which explains the lack of empathy for the suffering of others. Commonly, they remain indifferent to the possibility of physical pain or punishment and show no indication that they experience fear when threatened; this may explain their apparent disregard for the consequences of their actions and their lack of empathy when others suffer from their abuse.

The rage or tantrums that sociopaths frequently exhibit may represent the limit of emotion that they can experience. They watch and mime other people’s emotions then act them out to mask their psychotic tendencies. They often choreograph themselves like stage actors who study other people then mimic them.

Doerty worked around the courts as a lawyer for many years and mimicked the judiciary enough for former Governor Locke to appoint him to Superior Court as a token queer. He has virtually no understanding of constitutional law or human rights as he repeatedly showed in his decisions. [Rampant Judicial Delusion]

Johnson spent almost forty years in the academe including about fourteen years as a non-graduating student. That fitted him to imitate faculty members and many years later he continues to fool Emmert and Wise; otherwise, they would have got rid of him instead of repeatedly awarding him obscene salary increases.
[False Academic Credentials]

Mitchell, an out-of-work stage actor, unlawfully poses as a social worker. He had professional theatrical training and experience which he uses to abuse and control elderly people. His aberrant behavior has resulted in three cases of alleged homicide by abuse, five unlawful incarcerations, myriad arbitrary evictions and multiple perjury. [Ravening Sociopath]

Princes may neither claim ignorance of wrongdoing by their minions nor remain unaccountable and anonymous. American law does not distinguish between princes or minions when they commit unlawful acts. It holds individuals liable for their own acts or dereliction and they remain jointly and severally liable for any irresponsible, willful or negligent damage to others.

Sociopaths believe that rules and morals exist for weaker people who obey because they fear punishment. They feel indifference and contempt for them and believe that they "have it coming." No matter how bright, they repeatedly abuse, abandon, or betray sexual partners. Conning and manipulating others exists as their way of life. For the people over whom they hold authority, they either use an ingratiating manner and superficial charm like Mitchell or an abrasive and Draconian demeanor like Doerty and Johnson. They remain persuasive, poised and self-assured because they lack the (self)conscious feelings that normal people possess.

They lie pathologically, evade responsibility, feign forgetfulness, use vague and inconsistent answers about their past in a constant choreography designed to confuse and manipulate. Even when cornered and confessing, they will offer flimsy excuses or insincere apologies and then go back to lying again. They remain indifferent to the truth and will lie simply for the fun of it, so much so that their princes eventually come to their senses.

[Psychopath]

Electronic Prior Restraint

Doerty

Mitchell

Johnson

Judge James A Doerty, Superior Court, King County, Washington. Stephen A Mitchell - Elder Abuse Terrorist Ronald A Johnson, Internet Terrorist.

Cyber-Sociopaths

Denial-of-service attacks provide an example of current malfeasance and censorship that damages third parties. King County, University of Washington and Council House, Seattle have much in common. When viewed from a Machiavellian perspective, they provide a poignant analogy. An investigation into the behavior of James A Doerty, Ronald A Johnson and Stephen A Mitchell over a decade heightens that awareness.

It provides an understanding of the anarchic situation that currently exists in State of Washington (in particular Seattle) which adversely affects faculty members and students in one environment and elderly people in the other. Doerty demonstrates the identical “realpolitik” and lawlessness (devoid of democratic principles, ideological notions, civil and human rights, or due process of law) that exists at both institutions and among the judiciary. The behavior, detrimental to anyone not admitted to one of the parallel oligarchies, denies the constitutional right to freedom of expression to an ethical and moral majority.

Johnson published his title as: “Principal [UW] Technology/IT Officer as well as a Tenured Faculty Member in the Information School and the Department of Computer Science and Engineering”. This immediately aroused the author’s suspicion given Johnson’s litany of sociopathic behavior, pathological lying, and semi-literacy rewarded by obscene salary increases: pointers that frequently indicate the presence of false academic credentials.

Johnson helped UW and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) officials destroy the author’s research databases and these web sites in attempts to cover up institutional crimes, thus preventing him from working as a professor for more than two decades - a position that he held before moving to University of Washington.

Stephen A Mitchell, Council House, Seattle, the token goy in a Jewish mafia, provides the analogy for Johnson. Both Johnson and Mitchell use false academic and employment credentials and both exhibit identical dysfunction to cover up their criminal activity. As a sociopathic demagogue, Mitchell knows that fear and rabble-rousing provide the key to his success. A stage actor posing as a building manager, his orations appeal to the passions and prejudices of his audience to promote a subversive ethos that advances his career goals.

When alone, Mitchell locks himself in his office with his space toys and computer pornography. Reasonable people only have to read Doerty’s findings on this web site to understand his total dysfunction and judicial misconduct or ask UW faculty members about Johnson.

In Washington state, a person who falsely claims to possess a credential issued by an institution of higher education to gain a government-funded position commits a gross misdemeanor which carries with it maximum punishment of one year imprisonment and/or $5,000 fine. That punishment does not take into account penalties for multiple malfeasance after receiving due process of law, a right that they deny to others.

The psychotic triplets have, jointly and severally, destroyed computer systems through DoS attacks and web sites by flooding them. Mitchell used Doerty as a corrupt straw judge to evict and jail the author until he took web sites down. Johnson harassed him by destruction of his computer equipment, databases, and academic research to prevent him from obtaining gainful employment for two decades.
[Rampant Judicial Delusion] [Straw-Man Stratagem] [Ravening Sociopath] [Denial of Service Attacks (DoS Bots)]


More Sabotage and Malicious Mischief

Since publication of The Namesake (6 Jun 08), University of Washington, Information Technology has again maliciously damaged subscriber mailing systems, opt-in/opt-out applications, and Internet connections making them inoperable. Repair and restoration took three days at a cost in excess of $6,000.00. This single offense defines as malicious mischief in the first degree, a class B felony punishable by confinement in a state correctional institution for a term of ten years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of twenty thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine. [The Namesake]

Neither Mark A Emmert, President nor Phyllis M Wise, Provost and Executive Vice President, University of Washington have answered complaints about myriad similar Internet denial-of-service attacks; instead they have used willful blindness to evade civil or criminal liability. They have feigned ignorance of facts to evade their personal responsibility to investigate and insure prosecution of malfeasants. [Internet DoS Attacks]

Definitions for the purpose of RCW 9A.48.070 through 9A.48.090 inclusive:

(1) "Physical damage", in addition to its ordinary meaning, shall include the total or partial alteration, damage, obliteration, or erasure of records, information, data, computer programs, or their computer representations, which are recorded for use in computers or the impairment, interruption, or interference with the use of such records, information, data, or computer programs, or the impairment, interruption, or interference with the use of any computer or services provided by computers. "Physical damage" also includes any diminution in the value of any property as the consequence of an act;

(2) If more than one item of property is physically damaged as a result of a common scheme or plan by a person and the physical damage to the property would, when considered separately, constitute mischief in the third degree because of value, then the value of the damages may be aggregated in one count. If the sum of the value of all the physical damages exceeds two hundred fifty dollars, the defendant may be charged with and convicted of malicious mischief in the second degree. [RCW 9A.48.100]

Following publication of this notice (9 Jun 06), UW IT employees launched another felonious DoS attack which shut down all communication systems for one day. Restoration of service and additional operating costs amounted to $2,000.00 plus inestimable collateral damage.

UW IT repeated the DoS attack (12 Jun 08) which confirmed a pattern or practice of programmed vandalism every three days.

Both UW administrators and Council House directors have backstage connections with several Washington straw judges which allows them to continue to violate both Federal and State laws with impunity. A parallel procedure exists at University of Washington where administrators use their off-campus connections to destroy academic careers and silence heterodox opinion. Both constituencies use laissez faire policies, maintain political silence and deny due process of law. [Conspiracy of Silence] [Incompetence and Willful Blindness]

Seattle Jewish Mafia has tentacles that reach into all walks of Washington government and its institutions. Moreover, a UW administrator doubles as a Council House director and a US congressman had his mother living there. Other directors have political connections with university administrators and corrupt jurists which adversely affect tenants and anyone associated with them. Officials at US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), City of Seattle, King County, and University of Washington indirectly support the abuse probably to increase their power and share in misappropriated assets, available in 2012, estimated at $40 million.


National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW)

National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) formed a non-profit corporation then (at government expense) built and later refurbished Council House, Capitol Hill, Seattle. The apartment block rents independent- living apartments to senior citizens. It does not classify as a nursing home and does not legally house vulnerable adults although Mitchell advertises it as such so that he can gain psychotic control over tenants. Mitchell had the author unlawfully jailed for reporting alleged homicide and elder abuse. The authorities have still not indicted Mitchell and his thugs, despite probable cause, for depraved exploitation of the elderly by wealthy and powerful Council House directors who inhabit a culture of impunity. [Impunity]

Mitchell criminally assaulted, unlawfully evicted, illegally jailed, had complicity in homicide and suicide, bribed and tampered with witnesses, filed false and misleading criminal charges, and publicly stated that he will make tenants “prisoners in their apartments”. Now tenants seldom leave their apartments or the building in fear of running a gauntlet at the single entrance. Mitchell achieves his goals by coercing elderly people to acquiesce to his wishes with charisma which soon turns to control and employment of thugs to abuse them, traits typically inherent in sociopaths.

The author discovered that Islamic terrorist sympathizers used Council House computers at night to access terrorist information (a year before 911) and informed the directors. When the administrator failed to act, he reported the danger of a terrorist threat to FBI and received an acknowledgment. FBI later arrested members of an Islamic terrorist cell based upon that information. [Tall Structure Terror]

In retaliation for publishing the article, which could have saved many lives, Mitchell and his directors conspired at eviction, death of the author’s dog, and loss of all his possessions because the terrorism essay reflected badly upon them. They also ordered removal of a web site containing the story. The author did not comply with this abrogation of his First Amendment rights to publish as a freelance journalist.

Mitchell openly stated that he would not bring an action for defamation because the author did not have enough money to satisfy a settlement. He knew that he could not win a lawsuit because the content of the article classified as neither malicious nor false. Instead, he sent one of his thugs to attack the author in the street with a metal stick and has since issued death threats and committed four other assaults.

Mitchell publicly boasted that he had spent $10,000.00 of Council House money on legal fees and had still not succeeded in jailing the author or stopped him writing, but would persist. Eventually, using a straw judge, Mitchell had the author jailed for 111 days for not removing the web site and for continuing to write about Council House against his wishes. The judge opined that freelance journalists not regularly employed by publishers do not rank as bona fide and, therefore, do not qualify for protection under US First Amendment. [Opinion Unanimously Reversed by WA Supreme Court]

The judge locked down the author incommunicado, then guards made him lie on a cold concrete slab 23 hours a day for 25 days (without his gout and prostate medication) to torture him. The reason: someone had distributed a draft article that the author had written about elder abuse without his knowledge while he languished in jail which evidently provoked the torture. [Metamorphosis]

David C. Broom (formerly HM Consul, Seattle) now living in retirement in Seattle, colluded with the judge to move the author to solitary confinement when he did not take down the web site. Later, UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) officials learned of his conspiracy. Instead of addressing the issues and convening an inquiry into Broom’s involvement, they retroactively destroyed all documents and proof to cover up the outrage. [Without Let or Hindrance]

Council House directors (landlords), and two successive administrators, have for over two decades consistently neglected to comply with HUD directives. They deny tenants their civil rights and due process of law while using an aggressive administrative staff and violent enforcers to silence elderly dissenters.

Mitchell and his directors fail to realize that the term "independent living" means that management and staff must confine their activity to maintaining and running the facility. They must neither coerce tenants into any particular behavior or life-style nor force them to accept any particular ideology or religious belief; however, they continue to do so and HUD acquiesces to it. Similarly, faculty members and students at UW should have academic freedom restored to them. [Agency Accountability]

Besieged by federal and state lawsuits connected with his elder abuse and racism, Mitchell responded to them in the only way that he knows how - with pathological lying and deceit. During 2006, Council House directors either lost or had dismissed at least ten barratrous (frivolous and capricious) lawsuits based upon perjury and subornation that they filed against tenants; however, the courts did not punish them and the abuse continues. UW has also repeatedly instituted barratrous kangaroo courts and arbitrary action to enforce unlawful dictates with impunity.[Barratry] [Perjurers] [Impunity]

At Council House, three vulnerable adults have died from neglect and abuse and the directors have had five independent tenants unlawfully incarcerated. They have since covered up the homicides. In one case the victim's family and a Council House administrator benefitted financially by defrauding both Federal and State agencies prior to her death through disposition of assets. Several more tenants remain at risk and suffer daily abuse at the hands of administrators.[Who Killed Jackie Nations?]

Thomas A Carr - Seattle City Attorney - Malicious Prosecuttion

Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney and Jeaneen Watkins, Harassment Advocate, aided and abetted by lawyers in their office and by King County prosecutor, have covered up Council House crimes for at least a decade. Instead of prosecuting Council House directors and employees, Carr has maliciously prosecuted their victims on unsubstantiated evidence provided by Mitchell. His staff have now involved themselves in similar malicious damage to computers as that documented for Johnson. Malicious prosecution, system sabotage and malicious mischief classify as a felonies.

Any person without probable cause who fabricates reasons to arrest innocent people and attempts to prosecute them commits a class C felony punishable upon conviction with imprisonment in a state correctional facility for not more than five years. Mitchell continues to use Seattle Police Department as his private Gestapo while Carr knowingly and maliciously prosecutes criminal charges. He bases them upon perjured testimony filed by Mitchell and his directors against victims of elder abuse. UW misuses its own regulatory autonomy to do the same thing by document forgery, falsifying records, and malicious attacks on computer systems and databases.

Mitchell controls the extremes of an elitist board of directors and an impoverished minority population - he plays both ends against the middle. He has turned a minor administrative position for which he has no credentials into a costly quagmire of self-aggrandizement and elder abuse. Similarly, Johnson has constructed a psychotic niche at UW that both administrators and faculty will not challenge for fear of irrational repercussion. Doerty from his elevated bench grants them impunity. [Impunity]

With a UW administrator doubling as director of CH, the connection becomes evident. The dysfunctional Council House scenario matches precisely the behavior of administrators at UW. Not only do Doerty, Johnson, and Mitchell classify as psychotic triplets, the three organizations operate in consort using the same modus operandi. University of Washington, Council House, and Washington judiciary have created an anarchy that even Kafka could not have envisioned.

[Nmesis]

All salaries shown per annum after annualizing. See Portable Document File (PDF) for citations.

Christine O Gregoire - Retouched Beauty Masks Corruption

Whores of the Realm

US Supreme Court has determined that executive immunity bears the burden of justification based upon the nature of the act performed, not the identity of the actor who performed it. Political expedience coupled with bias defines as malfeasance and provides probable cause for lawsuits against governors who do not enforce constitutional guarantees.

If Gregoire does not comply with law, then her malfeasance makes her liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Washington state legislature must decide whether Gregoire can answer four questions affirmatively given the extensive, documented malfeasance extant in Washington State executive branch and at University of Washington.

In deciding probable cause for impeachment, a reasonable person must ask four questions that relate to any challenged act, omission, or decision:

1. Did the challenge involve a basic governmental policy, program, or objective?
2. Was the act or omission essential to the execution of that policy, program, or objective?
3. Did it involve agency policy evaluation, judgment, and expertise?
4. Did the agency possess constitutional, statutory, or lawful authority?

If clear and unequivocal answers in the affirmative result, then the challenged act, omission, or decision can, with reasonable confidence, classify as a discretionary governmental process regardless of its lack of wisdom. If one or more of the questions call for, or suggest a negative answer, then an official inquiry must take place into the facts and circumstances.

Reasonable grounds, coupled with good-faith, afford a discretionary basis for exemption from lawsuits for official acts performed by governors who hold qualified immunity dependent upon the scope of discretion and responsibilities of their office. However, executive disciplinary action predicates upon whether a governor under any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, exposed a citizen of the United States (or other person within that jurisdiction) to deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by constitutional law.

University of Washington administrators continue their autocratic form of government. That institution has the open support of the governor and attorney general in its criminal and exclusionary activities. Gregoire continues to deny due process of law using delay then denial of justice tactics as she has done for several decades.

Anarchy

Computer vandalism and Internet denial-of-service attacks continue. The Cabal has effectively granted criminals impunity and FBI, despite repeated requests, has apparently done nothing to stop the commission of international crime.

As governor of a state that claims democracy, Gregoire must: allow voters to decide issues based upon information obtained from the Internet; give them access to information relative to both sides of any particular issue; carry out her duty and responsibility to protect freedom of expression; stop condoning or granting impunity to government-funded censors and technologists; and stop interference with, and destruction of, the careers of controversial journalists and academicians by government officials.

Gregoire must immediately issue orders publicly to University of Washington to cease and desist use of taxpayer resources to fund unlawful denial-of-service attacks that harass and censor journalists to support political expedience. Otherwise, she has an international cyberwar to address. She has covered up serious crime at University of Washington for at least twelve years. Now she must come clean and take action to insure that due process of law takes place.

Phyllis M Wise, Provost and Executive Vice President, University of Washington.

Phyllis M Wise, Provost and Executive Vice President, University of Washington (UW) received twenty-six messages (2008) which asked her to order her staff to stop Internet denial-of-service attacks and other alleged criminal activity. Instead, of responding to the issues, she covered them up using willful blindness. Meanwhile, the vandalism continues. In law, the term "willful blindness" describes contrived ignorance. Officials seek to evade civil or criminal liability by feigning ignorance of facts that involve personal liability. [Incompetence and Willful Blindness]

Former Governor Gary Locke made the following recommendation upon hearing about the UW malfeasance; however, Gregoire (both as attorney general and governor) with Richard L McCormick and Mark A Emmert (successive UW Presidents) has ignored Governor Locke's suggestions for mediation and mitigation:

The Superior Court could call a grand jury if so requested by a public attorney on a showing of good cause. Also, the Organized Crime Advisory Board may petition the Supreme Court for an order appointing a special inquiry judge. If a special inquiry judge is appointed, the organized crime advisory board shall, with the consent of the Governor, name a special prosecutor.


Nothing Succeeds Like Excess

In a separate article, the author defines prior restraint and identifies current events sanctioned by Big Mamas and implemented by their mischievous, intellectually challenged leprechauns. Prior restraint and censorship have recently occurred at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), University of Washington (UW), Seattle Jewish Mafia (SJM) and other universities and government funded institutions.

The term "Big Mama" describes totalitarian university presidents and government officials who censor speech protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The term previously applied to Internet censors in the People's Republic of China. The analogy seems apt in light of the politically correct behavior now common in large and prestigious US universities as a parody on Big Brother, the omnipresent leader of a totalitarian state in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four.

Some content excerpted from Technocratic Despotism: Incognito and Safe from the Vexation of Thinking by Paul Trummel. Licensed to The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), Assembly for Computers in English (ACE) Newsletter, 10(1): (Summer 1996) 10-15.

NCTE has since removed the original article from their web site; consequently, the author has linked a PDF of the full text. [Nothing Succeeds Like Excess] [ACE Newsletter]



This statement counters record falsification, withholding, destruction, and forgery for political expedience by registrars at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and University of Washington. See curriculum vitae menus for substantiating information.

Paul Trummel PhD (RPI ABD), PhD (UW ABD), MS (RPI), MSc (UK), BSc (UK)
UK equivalencies in graphic communication recognized by Boston University, Northeastern University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Fitchburg State College, San Jose State University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and University of Washington with comparability twice certified by International Education Research Foundation (IERF), a credential evaluation service accredited by US Department of Education

Associate Professor, Communication and Rhetoric (Retired)
Special Doctor of Philosophy Program (SPhD), University of Washington
Fellow, International Society of Typographic Designers (FISTD)
Fellow, Institute of Paper Printing and Publishing (FIOP)
Member, Society of Authors, London

International Federation of Journalists, Brussels (International Press Card)
National Union of Journalists, London (UK Press Card)




Letters to the Editor

Let us Assume says Becker

Secondary Teacher (Retired)

As an American citizen I would hate to think that justice is as poor in the rest of the United States as is reflected in this hearing in Seattle, WA. As a former secondary teacher, I am equally appalled at the quality of education as reflected by Judge Becker's comments. Somebody in her teacher training missed the axiom: this is the problem, what is the issue.



A Seattle Jew Speaks Out

Senior Citizen

After reading how the Jewish Mafia operates in Seattle at Council House, an apartment block for senior living, I cannot help contrasting it to my own experience growing up Jewish in Seattle . . . hate-mongering at its worst . . . [Judaism] has never served me positively. On the other hand, Jungian psychology/philosophy has been my course and continues to support my psyche's conscious development - my "religion" of sorts.



Another Jim Jones?

Lauren Jeanne Hawk

Remember how Jim Jones started in San Francisco? The authorities thought he was terrific and he had widespread support. Whenever Mitchell talks about people who have resisted him, his face distorts and his anger pours out. . . . Many people have told me they support me fully but can’t take the chance to go to the authorities for fear of retribution from Mitchell. The sadness I feel for their fear and stress keeps me going.



First-Rate Gay Lawyers
in Town

Foggy

. . . Jimmy, a former Children's Court babysitter before he stumbled into his $100,000+/yr judgeship, ain't exactly a legal whiz to begin with. With literally no judicial background whatsoever, he's mooching off his fellow Gays to hold his job. With all the first-rate Gay lawyers in town, a little weasel like Jimmy was a poor choice for the bench.



Becker is a liberal woman who does not care about the law!

Janet Lanterman

Mary Kay Becker - A lazy opinionated woman, who uses the judge's bench to promote her own beliefs instead of following the law. . . . The attorneys involved in the case were stunned, and felt betrayed by the judicial system and especially Becker who was supposed to be smart.


Letters to the Editor

Letters should not exceed 250 words, with preference given to those letters responding to articles published in Contra Cabal.

Letters must include the author's name, city, and state, email address, and a phone number for contact and verification.

The Editor reserves the right to edit letters for length and clarity and not to publish all letters.

By submission of a letter, the author agrees that Contra Cabal may publish and/or license the publication of letters in print, electronically, and for archival purposes.


Nothing Succeeds like Excess

Academic freedom, an absolute right not an abstract philosophy, should not subserve economic considerations.

Moreover, information technology remains a right not a privilege despite technocratic claims to the contrary.

Legislative and judicial decisions have determined the right of individuals to distribute information freely and the Bill of Rights documents the protection individuals should expect from the state.

However, laws do not provide much protection when despotic administrators interfere with computer resources because they disagree with the content of messages: a disagreement probably based upon disclosure of their own malfeasance.

They fear dissent and have an aversion to controversy. Their addiction to political correctness frequently causes them to invoke censorship of Internet activities.

They not only empower their systems administrators to handle frivolous email complaints by arbitrarily removing computer access but also allow them to censor incoming mail - an outrageous invasion of personal privacy.

They act upon an irrational expectation that certain categories of email may contain something that Big Mama would not wish others to read then arbitrarily reject it.

Interference with email transmission not specifically proscribed by federal law classifies as a federal offense which Rensselaer and University of Washington officials commit with impunity.


About the Author

Paul Trummel (Nmesis)

Paul Trummel, published since 1944, uses the pseudonym Nmesis and openly declares personal or conflicting interests.

These conflicts may relate to topics or to opinion, especially when the content draws upon advocacy, experience, conclusion, or interpretation.

As an accredited journalist, he conforms with the code of conduct and ethics of the journalism profession, tested by courts in both Great Britain and the USA.

Since 1947, he has worked as a journalist, an editor (commercial and academic peer-review), a technical communicator, an associate professor (visual communi-cation and rhetoric), and as an administrator at several leading universities.

He has held international press credentials since 1959 and holds two elected international graphic arts fellowships.

He earned professional letters in the UK that translated into two baccalaureate degrees and a terminal graduate degree in the US.

He has also earned a Rensselaer graduate degree and two US PhD degrees (now ABD).

[Sherking Responsibility]

He taught graduate level students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Northeastern University, Fitchburg State College,
San Jose State University, Massachusetts Bay Community College, and a private institute of graphic design.

He held an administrative post at University of Massachusetts, Boston, and has lectured at universities in US, Europe, and Japan.

In 1957 (London), he founded and operated the first full-service technical communication organization, a group of publishing and technical/graphic communication companies where he held the position of chief executive officer.

In 1973 (Connecticut), he designed and marketed the first typesetting system driven by a minicomputer, the precursor for today's desktop publishing systems.

He has won an international silver medal for his satire and a US city award for his educational programs for disadvantaged people.

Since 1992, he has investigated and written several hundred articles on bureaucratic and elder abuse.

He founded Contra Cabal, one of the first electronic magazines to appear on the web, for which he develops the site, writes articles, designs pages, and produces graphics.

http://ContraCabal.org

Contra Cabal has now published for almost fifteen years.

Earlier, it published as email for six years. The hits/month now range between 100,000 and 150,000 with more than a million hits during the past twelve months.

Articles cover ongoing criminal activity by bureaucrats and elder abuse.

They describe the actions of corrupt judges and gross misconduct by lawyers who file frivolous law suits against tenants in government financially-assisted housing.

They outline how managers use unlawful retaliatory measures and propaganda to destroy the reputations of people who report illegal activity and racism.

Washington Supreme Court unanimously reversed a lower court decision that effectively allowed prior restraint and defined journalism inquiry as surveillance and harassment.

Repeatedly, lawyers who could find no fault with content instead personally attacked the author or his genre.

A corrupt judge imposed prior restraint and jailed him for contempt when he challenged the court decisions as a basic violation of constitutional and human rights.

To further coerce him, in consort with other jurists, the judge then arbitrarily transferred him to solitary confinement among murderers and rapists.

His published work in the print media for more than sixty years has received no challenge relating to accuracy.

People, among them elected judges and lawyers upon whom the public should be able to rely, have tried to stop him publishing information on politically sensitive issues.

That prior restraint, and restrictions on personal mobility, has now become a matter of international concern.

American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU - Seattle),
International Federation of Journalists
(IFJ- Brussels),
National Union of Journalists
(NUJ - London),
American Society of Authors and Editors
(ASAE - New York),
and Seattle Weekly
have all filed amicus curiae briefs with Washington Supreme Court in support of his successful First Amendment stance.

Credential validation upon request by journalists and other responsible parties from:


Contra Cabal Foundation

Contra Cabal web sites have achieved an extraordinary readership.

If Paul Trummel dies before he completes his work, then trustees have authority to continue publication as an educational project through the newly formed Contra Cabal Foundation, London which will own all publication rights.

The Foundation will publish Contra Cabal in perpetuity in the way that Sonia Orwell posthumously published the collected works of George Orwell.

Foundation trustees and directors (professional people, lawyers, and academicians in UK and US connected directly and indirectly with the International Federation of Journalists) will supervise editorial and design functions using young investigative reporters and graphic designers who wish to further their education in journalism.

They will receive trade union freelance rates of payment for their work.

Contra Cabal Foundation will respect former trustee the late William D Winn's last admonition "Go get 'em!" by continuing to report academic malfeasance and to expose morally repugnant academicians and public officials.

Readers should consider the articles and case studies as a work in progress.

More information about academic or government fraud and deceit frequently surfaces after victims or their associates read Contra Cabal.

That information becomes part of a relevant case study after verification and validation.

Students and current faculty members write letters to the editor on politically sensitive issues.

Some correspondents request name withholding to avoid retaliation.

Contra Cabal electronic magazine contains expose and satire.

Probably one of the first to appear on the web, it has now published since 1992.

The hits/month range between 100,000 and 150,000 with more than 1.5 million hits by about 60,000 unique visitors during the past twelve months.

Contra Cabal Foundation information available upon request by journalists and other responsible parties from:


ContraCabal.org
ContraCabal.net
ContraCabal.com
ContraCabal.us